Sdelki razuma. Konstituciya kantovskoy filosofii prava
The monograph examines Immanuel Kant's philosophy of law in the context of the legal logic of Kant's thinking as such. The difference between the question of fact (quid facti) and the question of law (quid facti) is related to the status of philosophical knowledge as transcendental. Since the categories of reason are not applicable to themselves, transcendental cognition cannot be explained in cognitive terms, but must be considered legally. Therefore, understanding Kant's critical project requires careful immersion in how law is reflected within this philosophy. Through an excursion into the concepts of factum (Chapter I), postulate (II), freedom (III), law in general (IV) and, finally, private and public law (V), the monograph unfolds the self-justifying logic of Kant's legal reason. Finally, chapter VI highlights the existing points of view on the question of the foundations of Kant's doctrine of law in order to sharpen the peculiarity of the author's position. Law is neither derived from the categorical imperative nor isolated from it, it is another, along with it, expression of the importance that a being who is conscious of his reasonableness attaches to practical life.
No reviews found
